When crimes are committed, video cameras with recording capabilities can provide valuable evidence to law enforcement and prosecutors.
This knowledge can save law enforcement from identifying the wrong person and arresting the wrong people. In a legal setting, it is very difficult to argue against video footage of a crime. Security cameras can also prevent false claims and fraud. If a person is lying about an incident, security camera footage can easily disprove their claim. This can help law enforcement get back to solving real cases faster. While the short answer is no, some municipalities do use video cameras to catch drivers who run red lights and to monitor the flow of traffic in congested areas.
The former can increase driver and pedestrian safety, while the latter can provide timely traffic and road condition information to commuters. Cameras monitoring road activity can also help identify stolen vehicles quicker. Without security cameras, law enforcement must rely only on eyewitness reports of sightings of the stolen vehicle.
Are security cameras an invasion of privacy? |
With cameras, officials can monitor cameras in the area around the time of the crime to find the vehicle a lot faster. Security cameras can also lower insurance costs for homeowners and businesses. However, this is up to your insurance company. If you are considering installing security cameras at your home or business, you should consult with an insurance representative to see if they offer discounts or incentives for doing so.
- Surveillance In Schools Essay;
- format for writing research paper.
- Essay: Security Cameras as a Threat to Privacy - Essay UK Free;
- expository essay elements.
- Use of surveillance cameras Essay!
- december sat essay prompt 2012;
If your insurance company does offer these perks, they are doing so because it is a cost-effective practice. For example, if you have cameras posted around your home or business, you are less likely to have a break-in or other crime committed on your property. Therefore, you are less likely to have to file an insurance claim. It saves both you and your insurance company money when you install security cameras at your home or place of business. There is not a lot of large-scale data about the effectiveness of security cameras in public places, but some smaller-scale data collection has shown that these cameras lower crime rates and are effective in their areas.
The presence of a video camera in a public place could be enough of a deterrent to a criminal, or even a sign posted that states the area is under video surveillance. However, more data is necessary to show whether security cameras are as effective as we think they are. It should be a priority to collect more data to back up the idea that security cameras are effective in every scenario and area.
Essay: Security Cameras as a Threat to Privacy
Figuring out if security cameras, or other monitoring practices, are the most effective will help make public areas the safest they can be for all citizens. While security cameras posted in public areas can provide many benefits to the public, they do pose some concerns that are necessary to take into consideration.
Security cameras monitoring public areas can appear to some as an invasion of privacy. If an innocent person is being monitored who has absolutely no intention of committing a crime, they will still be monitored. The person watching the video cannot tell whether something will happen or not.
Surveillance camera essays
This uncertainty can cause many bystanders to be monitored needlessly. However, this is necessary in order to catch crimes. While most people agree that we face serious security challenges these days, not everyone believes installing security cameras in public places is an acceptable method for protecting our citizens. It can cost a lot of money to install security cameras, monitors and related equipment in a public area. This equipment is expensive to purchase and must also be maintained.
Many of these cameras are outdoors, so they are weathering rain, snow, wind and every other natural phenomenon. When the cameras are not working properly, they are basically useless. Costs can increase with this extra maintenance and the need to replace equipment when it breaks. Besides the cost of purchasing the equipment and maintaining it, there is also the cost of labor.
However, together with adequate regulations some of the worst consequences could be reduced. Therefore, personally I feel that the use of surveillance cameras should be controlled in Singapore.
Argument Essay on Security Cameras - Feedback / Revision
In this case, the term "controlled" means: to use laws to limit the amount or growth of the use of surveillance cameras. It should be allowed when it is used on matters regarding individual's safety and by the government where they deem fit to install the surveillance cameras. Currently, there are no laws in Singapore protecting individuals from the scrutiny of the surveillance cameras. This technology is also changing our moral and ethical values along with the way we employ them.
There is no doubt that installing surveillance cameras provide individuals a sense of security as these surveillance cameras will provide a deterrent against crime. However, with the increasing use of surveillance camera in the society, and growing at a tremendous rate, one wonders if privacy is eroding. With reference to the article, the use of surveillance camera enables various government bodies to use the device to perform certain regulations or rules such as those used by the Land Transport Authority LTA on expressways to capture the images of vehicles that violate the law.
Apart from that, the surveillance cameras are also used to give an o Continue reading this essay Continue reading. Toggle navigation MegaEssays. Saved Essays.
Related argument essay on security cameras
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved